The Minority in Parliament has strongly criticized President John Dramani Mahama’s decision to cancel fuel allowances for political appointees, describing it as a populist move and a public relations stunt. The President, on July 15, announced the cancellation as part of broader efforts to reduce government spending and promote fiscal discipline. However, Akuapem North MP Sammy Awuku questioned the sincerity of the directive, calling for transparency on how much will be saved and clarity on who qualifies as a political appointee.
Awuku challenged the government to go further by shutting down fuel depots at the Castle and Jubilee House if it is serious about ending free fuel for appointees. He raised several questions about the implementation of the policy, including whether it applies to ministers, CEOs, and presidential staffers. “We need clarification on the definition of the fuel allowance,” he stated, pressing for more detailed information about the categories of officials affected and the actual cost savings to the state.
In contrast, NDC MP Samuel Atta Mills defended the President’s move, describing it as a positive step that sets a good example for public office holders. He said the measure would reduce the burden of maintaining numerous government vehicles and encourage responsibility among appointees. Mills emphasized the need for sacrifices in governance, saying, “They should buy their own fuel… it would be good for the nation.” The contrasting views from both sides of the House underscore the ongoing debate over the effectiveness and sincerity of the President’s cost-cutting policy.
